New York City’s socialist experiment just got a $1.1 billion chief architect. Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani has tapped his long-time advisor, the low-profile DSA operative Elle Bisgaard-Church, as his Chief of Staff—the ultimate gatekeeper to City Hall. Her prized creation? The radical, anti-cop plan to launch the NYC Department of Community Safety, replacing sworn officers with social workers in a move critics warn will unleash chaos.

Context/Background

The city is reeling from a mayoral election that saw the progressive wing of the Democratic Party consolidate power under Mamdani, an Assemblyman from Astoria, Queens. His victory signaled a clear mandate for a hard-left agenda, with public safety becoming the central flashpoint.

For years, the radical Left has sought to dismantle the institutions that maintain order, and the New York City Police Department (NYPD), the largest force in the country, remains their ultimate target. Mamdani, who once publicly branded the NYPD as “racist, anti-queer & a major threat to public safety,” now controls the executive branch.

At the center of this looming crisis is Bisgaard-Church, an Ivy League-educated California native (she attended Columbia University) who is the undisputed strategic genius behind Mamdani’s shocking rise. She is described by allies as Mamdani’s “producer”—the brains translating socialist rage into actionable policy. She helped lead the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) mobilization that delivered the win. Her official appointment as Chief of Staff places the most radical elements of the “Defund” movement directly in charge of the city’s operational machinery.

This move validates every conservative warning about the path of progressive politics: activists don’t just protest; they take power and implement their most extreme fantasies.

The $1.1 Billion Shell Game: Funding the NYC Department of Community Safety

The centerpiece of the Mamdani-Bisgaard-Church agenda is the proposed NYC Department of Community Safety (DCS). This new civilian agency comes with a breathtaking price tag: a proposed budget of $1.1 billion.

Mamdani’s team claims this massive expenditure—which rivals the budgets of entire city agencies—will come from efficiency savings and “reallocated resources.” The reality is this is a blatant $1.1 billion NYPD replacement plan designed to shift critical public safety funding and responsibilities away from trained officers.

The core mission of the DCS is a public health approach to crime, which sounds innocuous until you read the details. It involves:

• B-HEARD expansion New York: Moving the existing Behavioral Health Emergency Assistance Response Division (B-HEARD) pilot program citywide and expanding its scope.
• Transit Takeover: Deploying specialized teams of peers, EMTs, and mental health professionals into the NYC subway stations with the highest mental health crises, explicitly replacing police-led outreach.
• Crisis Management: Greatly expanding funding for “violence interrupter” and hospital-based programs.

The fundamental flaw? When a schizophrenic man is menacing commuters in the subway, citizens call the police, not a caseworker with a clipboard. The progressive dream of replacing the badge with a textbook has never worked in a major metropolitan area—it has only led to spiking crime and a sense of institutional surrender.

The DSA’s Shame: Ideological Motivations Exposed

Bisgaard-Church’s personal philosophy reveals the ideological extremism driving this policy. She told City & State that she feels “daily, deeply ashamed to live in a place where we allow people to sleep on concrete at night.” She found a shared sense of “rage at such a moral failure” within the NYC DSA.

While addressing homelessness is a valid civic concern, weaponizing that shame to justify the dismantling of law enforcement is a dangerous form of political blackmail.

This confession lays bare the socialist motivation: the DSA views the police not as protectors, but as the primary enforcers of an unjust economic system. Therefore, the DCS is not a public safety improvement; it is an ideological tool to undermine the state’s legitimate authority to maintain order. The goal is a socialist takeover NYC, starting with the subway system.

Expert Insights

Public safety veterans and policy analysts are sounding the alarm over the reckless nature of this $1.1 billion proposal.

“This plan is a fantasy built on ideology, not reality,” said Patrick J. Lynch, former President of the Police Benevolent Association, speaking to Stucci Media. “You can’t solve a violent transit incident with a hug and a pamphlet. What happens when the social worker shows up and the suspect pulls a knife? The police are trained, armed, and legally authorized to protect the public and themselves. The moment you strip away that authority and training, you leave New Yorkers vulnerable. The DCS is a death sentence for effective policing.”

A retired NYPD Chief, speaking on condition of anonymity due to continued contractual obligations, offered a blunt assessment of the political maneuvering. “The name Mamdani may be on the door, but this is Bisgaard-Church and the DSA calling the shots. This is the implementation phase of the Mamdani anti-police rhetoric he tried to walk back before the election. They are giving $1.1 billion to people whose only qualification is hating the police. Our officers are already overwhelmed, responding to 180,000 emotionally disturbed person calls a year. Reducing our capacity by 40% will not free up officers; it will simply create 40% more crises that we are then forced to clean up.”

Human Interest

The true victims of this policy will not be police administrators, but everyday commuters and residents of the working-class neighborhoods the police serve.

Consider the case of a transit worker in the Bronx, like Miguel Rodriguez, who sees the daily struggle for safety on his morning commute. “I’ve seen things you wouldn’t believe on the D train,” Rodriguez stated. “A man threatening people with a hammer, a woman having a seizure. In both cases, the NYPD was there fast. They knew how to secure the scene. If you send a social worker into that chaos, they become the next victim. People riding the subway don’t want a government experiment; they want to get to work safely.”

This shift is not about defunding the police; it’s about defending the right of every New Yorker to feel secure in their own city. The idea that a team of unarmed civilians is capable of managing the high-stakes, violent realities of the subway system is an insult to the men and women who put their lives on the line daily.

Balanced Perspective

Proponents of the NYC Department of Community Safety argue that the plan is not about eliminating the police, but about “freeing up” officers to focus on serious, violent crime like murder and shootings. They point to the fact that police are currently over-tasked with handling mental health, homelessness, and quality-of-life issues that they are not specifically trained to handle.

Mamdani’s supporters claim the DCS plan simply formalizes and expands successful pilot programs, like those used in other cities, by providing a “prevention-first, community-based solution.” They stress that the NYPD will retain a “critical role to play.”

However, this perspective conveniently ignores the hard figures. The existing B-HEARD pilot often deems 60% of crisis calls ineligible for a non-police response, indicating that the vast majority of real-world emergencies still require law enforcement presence. Furthermore, a police department’s presence is often the only thing deterring violence in the first place. This “balanced perspective” ultimately rests on a foundation of wishful thinking and a dangerous underestimation of the chaos that exists on the streets and in the subway tunnels of New York.

Visual Elements

• Embed a stock photo of a New York City subway platform here. The image should be clean but have a subtle sense of tension or disorder, emphasizing the urban environment the DCS teams will patrol.
• Chart placement (next to the $1.1 billion section): A simple bar chart comparing the proposed $1.1 billion DCS budget (tall red bar) versus the current budget for the NYPD’s entire Transit Bureau (shorter blue bar). Caption: The Price of Radical Ideology.
• Featured Image: A split image: one side showing a close-up of Mamdani or Bisgaard-Church (serious, politically-charged), the other side showing a NYPD officer patrolling a city street (authoritative, determined).

Conclusion

The appointment of Elle Bisgaard-Church is not just a staff change; it is the final activation of the radical Democratic Socialist agenda for the city. By putting the architect of the NYC Department of Community Safety in the most powerful administrative role, Mayor Mamdani is sending an unmistakable message: New York’s future involves replacing the rule of law with the chaos of social experimentation, funded by over a billion dollars in taxpayer money. For those who value safety, the fight to preserve the NYPD has just begun.

FAQ Section

Q: Who is Elle Bisgaard-Church and why is her appointment controversial? A: Bisgaard-Church is Mayor Mamdani’s new Chief of Staff and the strategic mind behind his campaign. Her appointment is controversial because she is a high-ranking DSA operative and the “chief architect” of the anti-police, NYC Department of Community Safety proposal, signaling a shift toward socialist governance.

Q: What is the main goal of the $1.1 billion NYPD replacement plan? A: The proposed $1.1 billion NYPD replacement plan (DCS) aims to shift responsibility for non-violent 911 calls, mental health crises, and homelessness outreach in key areas like the subways away from uniformed police officers and toward unarmed social workers and mental health professionals.

Q: What is the risk associated with the B-HEARD expansion New York under the DCS? A: The risk of the expanded B-HEARD program is that it sends unarmed civilians into potentially dangerous situations, particularly in transit hubs, increasing the risk of harm to both the new civilian staff and the public. Critics argue it reduces police capacity without solving the root safety issues.

Q: Does Mayor Mamdani support the “Defund the Police” movement? A: Mayor Mamdani previously engaged in Mamdani anti-police rhetoric, calling the NYPD a “rogue agency.” While he has since walked back calls to slash the NYPD budget, the creation of the $1.1 billion DCS is viewed by critics as a creative way to achieve the same result: a systematic reduction of police authority and function.

Don’t let the socialist tide erode your city’s safety. Stay informed with the facts the mainstream media ignores. Subscribe to Stucci Media today for the conservative analysis and reporting that keeps power in check.

Copyright © Stucci Media 2025 | All Rights Reserved